Ingrowing Angles, or How Not to Name Thee Nine Angles Thingy

An article currently [2009 CE] drifting lopsidedly around in cyberspace – with a title something like Angles incarnés and giving hyperlinks to boring stuff about a dead two-dimensional shape, the trapezoid – reveals yet again the Aquino-cult for the silliness it is, and yet again serves to highlight the esoteric, intellectual, and sinister, superiority of The Order of Nine Angles over and above the ToSers and the LaVey “satanism of and for the mundanes”.

The aforementioned article gives some details about Aquino’s much hyped Ceremony of Nine Angles, which some idiots claim was the basis for “our” name, although even a cursory glance by a mundane would suffice to show the fundamental, irreconcilable difference between our initiated, esoteric, and sinister, understanding of the term angle, and the silly, pretentious, clumsy, and totally un-esoteric use of the term angle by Aquino, LaVey, and by those mundanes following such pretentious mundane drivel.

In addition, Aquino used a pantomime language – deriving from the fictional works of Lovecraft – which when said or “chanted” serves only to give us a fit of the giggles: F’tang f’tang o-lay olay biscuit barrel… kind of stuff (maracas in the background are optional). Let’s run that again, with maracas on: F’tang f’tang o-lay olay biscuit barrel…

In the matter of Aquino’s angles – Ouch! Is that my ingrowing-angle hurting again? – there is a lot of mumbo-jumbo, and very little, if any, genuine esoteric substance, with the mumbo-jumbo itself containing a lot of pretentious pseudo-biblical poesy such as “the laughing one doth cry and the flute wail…”

Well, wail away this Aquino-esque Magic Flute might, for nothing doth come forth, and will ne’er come forth from a boring two-dimensional geometrical shape. Wherein, of course, lies the fundamental flaw – and the laughable nature – of this whole Aquino angles thingy.

For The Order of Nine Angles, an angle is, of course, a five-dimensional concept – composed of two causal metrics “meeting” (or joining) at a particular point in a four-dimensional Space-Time (causal) continuum, with this particular “meeting” (or joining) being only one particular causal re-presentation of an acausal event; that is, the “angle” changes in causal Time. It is only one causal re-presentation of one event, which event is subject to acausal change.

In more simple terms, our angle can be considered as an extension of a spherical, basic three-dimensional, angle – familiar from spherical geometry. But each intersecting arc is a four-dimensional metric in causal Space-Time, so that to describe it in more detail (at least causally) one has to use a Tensorial re-presentation (such as used in describing for example a Riemannian metric). Even then, this is only another causal simplification (a causal abstraction devoid of acausality), since what we in the ONA are describing are acausal energies being manifest in the causal dimensions (in four-dimensional causal Space-Time) by means of such an “angle” – and these energies can manifest in various ways, by various means.

Let us consider one particular instance – where the means is a particular three-dimensional object (a tetrahedron) composed of a particular material (quartz) and where the esoteric (acausal) aspects of this combination (a quartz tetrahedron of a certain size)  are activated by sound resonance (sonic vibrations). This particular instance is used, for example, in the simple ONA Nine Angles rite, where a particular combination of sound waves (a chant or chants at the correct pitch or pitches – for example a fourth or a fifth apart – and of the correct intensity) will “activate” the crystal, that is, make it a (temporary) nexion to the acausal, enabling the flow of causal energy from the acausal into the causal. Thus, the static, causal and a particular combination of nine angles of the crystal tetrahedron become something much more than just three-dimensional geometrical constructs in particular moment of causal Time; they become “alive” because imbued with acausal energy. That is, there is a phase-shift – from causal Time to acausal Time.

Of course, this is just one instance of our esoteric use of the term angle – there are many more, and all these usages, by us, of the esoteric term “nine angles” serve to highlight the buffoonery of Aquino’s use of the term. Our esoteric usage of the term nine angles also serve to reveal those who claim we, of the ONA, somehow “ripped off” Aquino’s work, for the laughable mundanes that they are.

ONA

[ Originally posted October 120 yf by Ms PointyHat on the Sinister Times blog ]

As first described in a footnote to the ONA MS The Nine Angles – Esoteric Meanings (published in facsimile in Hostia, Volume 1, 1991 e.n.) a nexion – the causal within the acausal (or vice versa) – could possibly be mathematically represented by a Tensor which has nine non-zero symmetric components, rep-presenting a basic causal Space (and forming the “nine subspaces” of one causal apprehension), and whose asymmetric components re-present (some of) the acausal aspects involved in a particular nexion (acausal within causal).

Thus, it is possible to write an equation involving this particular tensor which describes (in a quite limited way) such a nexion and the collocation of spaces within it, with the boundary conditions of this equation giving the metrics of the “Space-Time” of the nexion. Thus, this equation would re-present something of the fusion of causal-acausal energy, and this itself might lead to new (to current causal Science) energies being described, and thence to the development of new, acausally-based (that is, “organic”), technologies.

Two important considerations, however, should be noted. First, that such an equation is only a limited and causal re-presentation, based on a causal mathematics, and thus cannot fully describe either the causal or the acausal aspects of the nexion. Second, that no conventional mathematical representation – tensorial or otherwise – can correctly describe any aspect of the acausal, since all conventional mathematical descriptions currently known to us depend on causal metrics, on causal Time. To correctly describe acausal Spaces (and thus acausal energy itself), a new mathematics has to be created which is based on acausal geometry and acausal Time, and which thus can re-present an acausal metric.

The facsimile of the particular MS mentioned above also shows, in diagrammatic form, the relation of the Nine Angles to the (double) tetrahedron; to the helical path (q.v. the hand-drawn diagrammatic of The Wheel of Life in facsimile editions of Naos); to the Tree of Wyrd; and to the “Four Gates” and thence to the “inverted pentagram”. For more details of some of these esoteric relaitons, see the fascimile of the MS The Secrets of the Nine Angles, also published in Hostia, Volume 1.